Diet in pregnancy-more than food.

High food quality, together with adequate macro- and micronutrient intake in pregnancy, is crucial for the health status of the mother and child. Recent findings suggest that it could also be beneficial or harmful in the context of the well-being of the whole future population. According to the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis, most conditions that occur in adulthood originate in foetal life. Moreover, some epigenetic events, modified inter alia by diet, impact more than one generation. Still, the recommendations in most countries are neither popularised nor very detailed. While it seems to be important to direct diet trends towards a healthier lifestyle, the methods of preventing specific disorders like diabetes or asthma are not yet established and require further investigation. CONCLUSION: In this review, we will summarise the recommendations for diet composition in pregnancy, focusing on both diet quality and quantity. What is Known • High food quality, together with adequate macro- and micronutrient intake in pregnancy, is crucial for the health status of the mother and child. What is New • Recent findings suggest that the diet could be beneficial or harmful in the context of the well-being of the whole future population. Most conditions that occur in adulthood originate in foetal life. • Moreover, some epigenetic events, modified by diet impact more than one generation.

[Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin for labor induction in post-term pregnancy]. / Porównanie skutecznosci misoprostolu i oksytocyny w prowokacji porodu w przypadku ciazy przenoszonej.

OBJECTIVES: To compare labour induction intervals between vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin as well as side effects of induction in post term pregnancies with intact membranes. METHODS: One hundred women were retrospectively selected to two groups treated with vaginal misoprostol 50 micrograms every 12 hours as needed to maximum 150 micrograms and treated with intravenous oxytocin. The primary outcome measure was time from induction to vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis was performed by t-Student test. RESULTS: Maternal age, parity, gestation were similar. There was a statistically important difference in labour induction intervals between the two groups. The mean time +/- SD to vaginal delivery in misoprostol group was 20.6 +/- 15.2 hours compared with 11.23 +/- 7.4 hours with oxytocin (p = 0.0396). Induction of labour failed in 12% and 32% in misoprostol and oxytocin treated group. Pethidine consumption in oxytocin treated group was higher (41 mg vs 89 mg, p = 0.04). Episodes of vomiting were more frequent in misoprostol treated group (22% vs 6%). There were no episodes of uterine hyperstimulation in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oxytocin stimulation resulted in a shorter induction to delivery interval. In misoprostol group induction failed in only 12% whereas in oxytocin group in 32%. There were no serious side effects in both groups. In misoprostol treated group patients required less analgetics then in oxytocin treated group.